On 31.10.20 01:36, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 2:13 PM Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 29.10.20 00:10, Rosen Penev wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:20 AM Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> In my personal experience, Meson seems harder to maintain. But that's >>>> mostly because of two things: I'm used to Make, and Meson (itself and >>>> the integration in flashrom) is young. So how about you bring the Meson >>>> build up-to-speed first? and once it's able to produce the same binaries >>>> on all platforms decide if it's working out? >>> meson is younger than make, so makes sense that there's some pain. >>> Much better than dealing with multiple and potentially incompatible >>> versions though. there is only one meson. There are multiple Make >>> projects. Simply having a minimum version is all that's needed. >> >> That's right. I also thought about checking Meson into the flashrom >> repository to solve that version issue and that Meson isn't available >> as package for all targeted OS (again, that might not be true anymore). >> But then I realized that Ninja is the actual thing that was missing on >> most systems. > Right. PIP can solve the meson issue.
PIP is another dependency. Not too bad, maybe even less bad than gmake. > > There is no currently supported OS that has a meson or ninja version > that is too old. Supported by flashrom? or supported by Meson? in either case, is there a list? Nico _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
