Rob:

Does the SWF have to be embedded in the web page or can it be
standalone?

Thanks,

Jack

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Rusher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Jack,
> 
> You compile the SWF on a server with Flex install. Then copy the 
generated
> SWF over to your web server and embed it in a web page.
> 
> The difference is that you don't need a Java Application Server 
running.
> i.e. more system resources
> 
> I'm not positive, but I think you need special licensing 
permission from MM
> to deploy a Flex app without the server.
> 
> Regards,
> Rob Rusher
> 
> Macromedia Certified Flex Instructor
> e:[EMAIL PROTECTED] c:303.885.7044 im:robrusher
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of jwc_wensan
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:59 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex License(s) & Performance
> 
> Darron:
> 
> Thanks for your input.
> 
> I read Ted's post. His production server does not have Flex.  Where
> is the SWF being served from?
> 
> Forgive my ignorance, but if you need a flex license for every 
server
> the SWF sits on, what's the difference?
> 
> Can you elaborate further?
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Jack
> 
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Darron J. Schall" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > jwc_wensan wrote:
> > 
> > >With the above scenario how many simultaneous users can 
adequately
> > >access the server before I would need a second server?  Or is it
> > >better to ask how many per hour?
> > >  
> > >
> > See Ted's entry here about scaling Flex:  
> > http://www.powersdk.com/ted/2005/05/scaling-flex.php
> > 
> > I completely agree with him as well.  I don't have Flex running 
on 
> the 
> > server at all.  Instead, I take my Flex-compiled .swf and place 
it 
> on a 
> > "typical" web server.  Then, the Flex application is delivered 
as 
> a .swf 
> > and there's no need for the server to do any extra processing at 
> all.  
> > I've never had a server crash because it couldn't send out .swf 
> files 
> > fast enough.  Keep in mind though, you'll need a Flex license 
for 
> every 
> > server the .swf file sits on.
> > 
> > You can use RemoteObjects without a Flex server running as well, 
> but 
> > you'll need to use another AMF gateway such as OpenAMF (or you 
can 
> use 
> > ColdFusion).  If you use WebServices, you might need a little 
shim 
> > script to get around the security restrictions of the Flash 
Player 
> > (loading data across domains), depending on what server the web 
> services 
> > are located on.
> > 
> > >Also, I read somewhere that RemoteObjects is faster.  Is it a
> > >signficant increase?
> > >
> > In general RemoteObjects are faster because it uses AMF, which 
is 
> a 
> > binary format and much less verbose than WebServices.  It's hard 
> to give 
> > a definite yes/no answer because I've actually seen results go 
> both ways...
> > 
> > -d
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com 
> Yahoo! Groups Links




--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to