it's current price model... and it is 1.5 - just slightly more mature than a
version 1.0, and our company rarely ever adopts version 1 of anything for
use at an enterprise level. I would think that the more mature, less
expensive Flex 2.0 would be the most desirable path. I know that we'll be
employing it all over the place once it's out of beta. My web team has no
desire to even look at 1.5 now that 2.0 is on the way.
Darren
>From: "Tom Chiverton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
>To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Article on Cairngorm for Fusion Authority
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:07:47 +0100
>
>I can't see everyone on the released Flex 1.5 automatically upgrading to
>Flex 2 (even for new-start projects) when it comes out of alpha/beta.
>
>
>Tom Chiverton
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
| Web site design development | Computer software development | Software design and development |
| Macromedia flex | Software development best practice |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
