Erik Hofman writes: > -rw-r--r-- 1 erik user 648823 May 12 2001 js-1.4-2.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 erik user 1046117 Mar 13 19:12 js-1.5-rc4.tar.gz
What does everyone else think? Should this be bundled unpacked in the SimGear source tree and built automatically (as with expat, our XML parser), bundled as an archive so that users can build it if they don't already have it installed (as with metakit and zlib), or left as an external, optional extra? I'd like to embed an interpreter in FlightGear, and ECMAScript is an excellent candidate language, but it would be nice if the interpreter were a lot smaller. Erik -- what do your bindings look like? Is anyone going to argue for embedding a small Scheme interpreter instead? Does anyone know of a smaller ECMAScript implementation? All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
