They are very helpful, and that's why the first test of Doxygen turned up such good results IMHO. If it's decided that this is the way to go, then a simple code documentation standard would need to be applied to the source to pull out the information we think is valuable.
Cheers, Mike On Monday 23 December 2002 08:16, David Megginson wrote: > Michael Bonar writes: > > > MSVC6 has a Visio add-on that allows you to reverse engineer C code > > into UML diagrams. Anybody have experience with it? I was > > thinking of giving that a try to see what it looks like. In the > > meantime, I will see what I can find on code documentation. > > Many of the code modules I've written have JavaDoc-like comments > attached in the *.hxx files -- those might be helpful. > > > All the best, > > > David > > -- > David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
