Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I don't see the real benefit of this naming change. I rather see the
burden of changing fgrun. And there are options that are not reduced to
a property assignment.
True, those should be kept. But the main reason I started this was because:
1. We have at least two options for boolean assignment
2. We have more than two options for string assignments
When using the --prop: method this will be reduced to just one option
with one of several arguments.
3. The options.xml (and associated language files) are rather hard to
maintain. Not to mention the fact that the non English versions are
hopelessly out of date.
4. I think the --prop: method would make utilities like fgrun a lot
easier to maintain since it can maintain a simple database of
properties and it's arguments instead of a lot of different options.
But it's not like I want to push this all of a sudden.
Erik
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
