On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:25:21 +0100, Thomas wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Am Freitag 03 März 2006 21:55 schrieb Martin Spott:
> > Jon Stockill wrote:
> > > I think there have been objects added for that area, but the
> > > screenshots I've seen seem to indicate that a lot more are
> > > available. The power station data for Germany was added this
> > > morning, so that'll give a few hundred more objects when it's
> > > exported tonight. Just a generic model for now, but since these
> > > things are often used as reporting points
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > To my experience power stations are most useful when you fly over
> > the clouds and don't want to bother with radio navigation. Simply
> > follow the cloud-'towers' that break through the 'regular' cloud
> > layers and you're done  :-)
> 
> Yep, we're just calling them visual VOR, though visual NDB might be
> more  appropiate... Nice for cross bearings if you only have 1 VOR
> receiver.
> 
> BTW would it be possible to somehow wrap the 3D clouds code in a model
> animation, so that it could be used for  smoke/steam plumes from
> cooling towers?

..if you're thinking "check for vapor pressure, dew point" etc, 
some of this code could be used to draw contrails, too.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to