Hi gerard,

..on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:54:02 +0100, you wrote in message
<200903231554.03018.ghma...@gmail.com>:

> On lundi 23 mars 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:14:49 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
> >
> > <200903231314.49784.ghma...@gmail.com>:
> > > My purpose was to point that error:
> > >
> > > When we start FG with a JSBSim aircraft on a moving carrier the
> > > groundcache is right, the Aircraft behaviour is right as long as
> > > we don't leave the deck.
> > >
> > > That nice groundcache feature definitively vanish  when we leave
> > > the Carrier, even if we come back on it.
> >
> > ..a question:  Should the "runway carriers" even use the
> > groundcache, "to place the runway correctly"?  And not e.g. a
> > "runway cache" that can move and even bend with its carrier?
> >
> > ..my understanding of the groundcache is, it is meant to tell when
> > and which part of aircraft touches the ground how, where, during
> > flights.
> >
> > ..over water, there's also tides and waves that should help make
> > FG rule on my 405kt prop strikes, with shake or die verdicts.
> > And, sea planes land too.
> >
> > > We get the same error when taking off from an Airport , we get to
> > > land on Carrier, the groundcache on Carrier is not right.
> > >
> > > To conclude ONLY the first FG  init of the groundcache ( on
> > > Carrier ) is right.
> > >
> > > It was not to oblige you to land on Carrier with a JSBSim
> > > Aircraft  :) Mainly because there not any within CVS ( was the F8
> > > which is now broken)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> 
> I am not certain that i do understand the question.
> Mathias has introduce a feature which makes that any solid object ,
> house on water, ship, carrier, floating bridge  etc.. is now solid
> for any  Aircraft, for instance that Snapshot which shows that  i
> could land  on a ship which was NOT defined to be a carrier, the ship
> was cruising at 25 knots http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Ouf.jpg
> 
> However that snapshot is showing a YASim Aircraft FDM. To day,  i am
> not sure, that would have been able to get the same result with a
> JSBsim aircraft ( for instance my Harrier GR7 ) .
> Then, now i am sure that won't be able to land, on a moving ship.
> Only possible with a "static" object.
> 
> Cheers
> 


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to