On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Gene Buckle <ge...@deltasoft.com> wrote:
> Curt, could the lack of enthusiasm been more due to the short timeframe
> than anything else? AFAIK, the GSoC participants are thinking about their
> entry *months* in advance.
>
> Why not make a note to revist a GSoC entry about 2-3 months before the
> 2011 entry deadline? That gives you guys plenty of time to identify the
> best use of the GSoC resources for FlightGear and a well prepared proposal
> would go a long way towards getting it accepted.
>
Hi Gene,
What you are sayin' makes sense.
Why don't we form a GSOC "committee" for lack of a better name. This
committee could start thinking and preparing right now, or at least a couple
months in advance. I'm willing to participate, but I can't commit to
pulling lead and carrying all the load myself. Do we have anyone who would
want to take charge of this effort, get things rolling, get things
organized, keep track of deadlines, and just do whatever it takes to push
this through for next year? We need a couple dedicated people to step
forward and take charge here. Otherwise we'll be sayin' the same things at
this time next year. :-)
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
