Thorsten ... snip ...
> Vivian wrote: > > > If I might interject here, I would draw your attention to the KC135. > > I looked it up and it got a 3 - seems to be reasonable, even given your > description (it shouldn't get zero because it actually flies - it > shouldn't get 1 because it has usuable gauges, thus maybe it really (= > according to a more involved set of criteria) should be a 2. > > So, funnily enough, the rating did produce a reasonable number, even given > the additional info which I could not have known (and indeed did not know > before). Your point being? > My point is your rating was based on an assumption that was totally incorrect: that the developer had made a reasonable effort to put the right gauges and levers in the right place. Do you make a similar assumption about the FDM? That it is approximately right? Is there much value in such a rating? Which brings me back to my original assessment - your rating system is a subjective view of how things look, and perhaps feel, (aka beauty contest) not an objective assessment of the accuracy of all aspects of a model. It is quite possible that a developer could give you a more accurate assessment of his model - he knows where the bodies are buried. Others are proposing this if I read their comments correctly. But I think you seek an independent view. I hope a better system will evolve from this debate. I think there is a need with 300+ aircraft a varying quality in our inventory. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel