>> Since I don't follow the 'rule' by coding 10.000+ lines in Nasal, I >> suppose that is partially thrown into my direction. From where I stand, >> there are good reasons to use Nasal - first of all the userbase which >> regularly compiles their own code is small, whereas people do install >> addon packages - so I get a lot more feedback and test results. Second >> that one usually can't really crash the whole system from Nasal. Third, >> it's very easy to quickly try something and very maintenance-friendly. >> Fourth, you can actually start developing something without knowing how >> the core code ties together - which I suppose takes a lot of time to >> learn. And so on. > > Replace "coding 10.000+ lines in Nasal" by "inventing a custom set of > traffic laws". The justification would match almost in the same way, > but nevertheless it's obstructive in both cases ....
Huh? You seriously think that 'inventing a custom set of traffic laws' could be justified because doing so you can't crash the whole system? Where did you get your driver's license? :-) And where would the large userbase of that new set of traffic laws come from? One of your weaker jibes... :-) Best, * Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
