Good work guys. Thanks. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Cedric Sodhi wrote: > NOTE: Some aircrafts explicitly require to be inside of FGDATA, because > they are programmed to expect their own data files to be found in > FGDATA. These airplanes will give you an error if you put them outside > of FGDATA (as you must). > > In order to solve this, you can symbolically link them individually into > FGDATA (Git is already told to ignore those links). > > $ ln -s /usr/local/flightgear/aircrafts/c172p /path/to/fgdata/Aircraft/ > > ===========
Surely that would be a bug in the aircraft that should be fixed? Also, IIRC there are a number of aircraft that have dependencies on other aircraft. Presumably this would be a good opportunity to fix those as well? -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
