>> FlightProSim does not defraud its customers as far as I am aware. > > According to reports on this very list (hint) and elsewhere they don't > comply with the money-back guarantee they advertize.
Well, since there's always small-print (which I don't know) I would leave that to the courts to establish if that is actually fraudulent or not. Personally, I think accusing someone of fraud needs a case better than reports on this list. > It is a fairly long stretch to say that these guys offer a legitimate > service, or meat the expectations their advertising creates. Again, the problem of a business not meeting every expectation their advertizing creates is known to everyone booking a holiday package via a travel agency. My hotels somehow never seem to look exactly like on the websites... The problem seems to be finding clear-cut and watertight criteria distinguishing legitimate from other business. > We haven't > been able to pin them down on a specific technical violation of the gpl, > but that doesn't mean they are legitimate, honorable, and ethical. Legitimate (as in legal) is a judgement I am not prepared to make. In my view, they're neither honourable nor particularly ethical, but that applies to many other businesses I know as well. Point being - to what length should I go to establish my ethical standards in the rest of the world? * Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
