Fabien Costantini wrote: >> Mike (or someone), can you add me to svn? > If it's not done already, just fill the application form on the website, > I'm sure you'll get an answer rapidly ;-)
Ah, thanks -- didn't know that was there. I see there's a "Request Developer Status" under 'My Account'.. cool. > >> Duncan, if you want, I can join the dox effort. > As the doxygen dox 1.3 initiator, I'd also welcome your efforts in that field. Great; sorry, guess I forgot all the folks involved in the dox push.. quite a Herculean effort, I'm sure..! >> If you're still in the initial stages of working out the >> dox style, I can hold off, or avoid certain parts you're >> still working on. We can synchronize by email. >> Not sure I understand what you mean here, but I would prefer >> that you harmonize with existing dox style first which is no looking >> bad imho. Then any suggestions are welcome to improve it of course. Will do. Wasn't sure if the dox strategy had been stabilized. >> I'd also be happy to start or assist in the creation of an >> FLTK doxygen "standards" page that describes how docs should >> appear, so that new docs follow a certain format. Great; I'll see if I can give it a start. When/if I do, I'll follow up here in fltk.development. I'll just hit the commenting style stuff based on what I see, then you guys can flesh it out/correct me, as there's probably details re: latex/tex gen that I know nothing about. Regarding actual FLTK doc tweaking, I expect I'll only be enhancing what's already in place.. I take it you all did the heavy lifting of converting the old html over to dox. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev