The very thought of group acceptance to be regarded as a
professional, is absurd (imho).
I only need to look at the craft in my hand to know if I
have done a 'good job'.
The guild system was a system of political and economic
control, and perhaps some quality control (but only by happenstance ;).
Were Michaelangelo and DaVinci guilds members? Group authority
brings the membership down to a low, common base.
I am never insulted by words or titles, they mean
nothing to me. Professor, tinkerer, surgeon, engineer, or
ditchdigger. These titles are a result of fees paid, not potential.
Please don't get upset by my terse remarks.
Perhaps I am a bit too individualistic. I have a deep seeded resentment of
systems and titles. Additionally, these remarks are all "In My Humble
Opinion".
|
- Re: [foldingboats] Thoughts on guilds... Robert North
- Re: [foldingboats] Thoughts on guilds... Gabriel L Romeu