Glenn, I made the necessary changes. I must admit, I didn't realise the
consequences of changing the serialized form of the FontCache class so
thank you for pointing that out.

Mehdi

On 10 August 2012 16:14, mehdi houshmand <med1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
>
> You were, of course, correct and I've made the necessary change as well as
> some other improvements. Glenn, I'll take a look at this serialization ID
> next.
>
> Mehdi
>
>
> On 8 August 2012 08:30, mehdi houshmand <med1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll do that at the same time. Thanks Glenn
>>
>>
>> On 8 August 2012 07:49, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:09 AM, mehdi houshmand <med1...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you have any more information than that? o.a.f.fonts.FontCache has
>>>> changed in that URIs, which were previously stored as Strings, are now
>>>> stored as java.net.URI, this means an exception is thrown when trying to
>>>> deserialize the class. I believe this exception is caught somewhere and it
>>>> causes a member of LazyFont to be null, is that what you're talking about?
>>>> Or is there another issue?
>>>>
>>>> This basically means the fonts-cache isn't backwards compatible, you
>>>> have to delete the old one (prior to Temp_URI_res merge) and it should
>>>> regenerate with the new serialization.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you have changed the serialization for the font cache and haven't
>>> done so already, you should change the value(s) of serialVersionUID in the
>>> classes which have changed their serialization.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to