Hi Pascal, thanks for your suggestions. I am using Debian Linux, so I don't have FOP.BAT on my system. Do you have any ideas where I should enter it on Linux?
Thanks in advance! Nancy Pascal Sancho wrote: > > nancy_b a écrit : >> Hi dear Pascal, >> >> Thank you for your response. I can't see any improvement in handling >> fonts. >> > See: > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/changes_0.95beta.html#Changes+to+the+Font+Subsystem > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/changes_0.95.html#Changes+to+the+Font+Subsystem >> For example, while FOP 0.94 hasn't complained, FOP 0.95 generates the >> following error message: >> >> WARNING: Font 'Symbol,normal,700' not found. Substituting with >> 'Symbol,normal,400'. >> Jun 2, 2009 2:14:25 PM org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo >> notifyFontReplacement >> WARNING: Font 'ZapfDingbats,normal,700' not found. Substituting with >> 'ZapfDingbats,normal,400'. >> Jun 2, 2009 2:14:31 PM org.apache.fop.hyphenation.Hyphenator >> getHyphenationTree >> >> I checked with my stylesheets, and I don't see any place where I >> explicitly >> told the compiler to use these fonts in my customization layer. After a >> lot >> of investigation, I changed the following default parameter: >> >> <xsl:param name="symbol.font.family">Symbol,ZapfDingbats</xsl:param> >> >> to >> >> <xsl:param name="symbol.font.family">Helvetica</xsl:param> >> >> and this caused these messages to disappear. However, I am not sure that >> it >> was a correct workaround. Why did FOP 0.94 not complain about these >> fonts? >> >> Moreover, it's still unclear to me how I should increase JAVA heap size >> using the Xmx argument? Where should I enter it? >> > Depending on how you invoke FOP: > Command Line under Windows: > In FOP.BAT, find the line [set JAVAOPTS=-Denv.windir=%WINDIR%] > > and add the parameter like this: > > [set JAVAOPTS=-Denv.windir=%WINDIR% -Xmx256m] > > Where 256m is for 256Mb > FYI, xmx defaults to 64m > > For embedded FOP, this depends on how the application is invoked. > For example, with Tomcat, you can do that from the monitor tool, tab > [Java], field [Max Memory Pool] >> Thanks a lot in advance! >> Nancy >> >> Pascal Sancho wrote: >> >>> nancy_b a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When >>>> compiling >>>> a >>>> large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs: >>>> >>>> FOP Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap >>>> space >>>> >>>> What is really frustrating and annoying is that FOP 0.94 did not have >>>> such a >>>> problem. Could you please explain why the new FOP version has this >>>> problem. >>>> We usually expect improvements in the newer versions... ;-( >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> Nancy >>>> >>>> >>> Hi, >>> There is a lot of improvment in FOP 0.95 that can explain a /light/ >>> increase of memory consumption (new image support, better font hanfling, >>> etc.) >>> Perhaps the memory allocated to FOP was /just/ enough with 0.94 version, >>> but not with 0.95 version. >>> You should 1st increase the max memory allocation to the JVM. >>> Also check this link: >>> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/running.html#memory. >>> >>> Pascal > HTH, > > Pascal > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.95-fails-to-compile-large-PDF-files---java-heap-space-tp23816647p23832365.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
