On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John Long <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, is it possible to ignore UNIX executables? I want to do an addr on a > > directory tree but I don't know how to tell fossil not to track the > > binaries > > since they have no naming pattern. Until now I've been living with it but > > it > > is very annoying and time for me to ask. Help! > > > > There is no mechanism for it to exclude binaries and doing so would break > the _only_ reason Fossil supports the +x bit at all: configure scripts are > normally marked as executable (and that was the only reason Richard > originally agreed to add +x support). > > One way to do it is to add everything: > > fossil add . > > and then: > > fossil status > > and look for the binaries. Then do: > > fossil rm those...files > > and they won't be included in the commit.
That's what I have been doing. But it seems very wrong to have to play games with this. Thanks for the info. /jl _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
