Hi *, Am 27.12.2017 um 16:19 schrieb Warren Young: > On Dec 26, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Ron W <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you are unable to make contact, you might consider "forking" the project >> (under a new name) and maintaining it yourself. > If it’s truly abandoned, you generally want to keep the name, unless it’s > trademarked or “bad” in some way. A better reason to change the name is when > you fork it while the original developer continues on with the project under > the same old name. thanks for your suggestions, I found a contact adress in the PKGBUILD file so I try to contact the author and see what his view is on his project.
> I guess it’s supposed to evoke “refined fossils”, and also fuel for your > software development efforts? If so, points for being cute. I'm not sure of the reasons, but I thought in the same direction(s) :-). Not too bad in conjunction with fossil, but too general to search for. But I also have to search for "fossil scm" to not get to many hits on watches ;-) Chris _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
