Sorry I am a newbie for fossil; until now I have used git and mercurial. I have a doubt regarding the sentence:
"A fossil repository is a 'unordered bag' of artifacts". In mercurial and in git the emphasys is on the "graph" concept... every object (for example in git a commit or a blob or a tag) is related to others... In any case also in fossil an artifact is related to others... so for me (sorry for the naive question) in any case also in fossil we have a graph, only that it is "hidden" inside the artifact format and not "external" in the repository "metadata". Could it be correct as a comment? Lino _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
