I'm a faithful Fossil user and I have enjoyed its "limitations" compared to Git because I consider them features. And pardon my commentary as I typically lurk on the list rather than provide ongoing input to the development.

If Git does all of this fancy stuff already, why not just use Git? Why must the beauty and simplicity of Fossil be 'polluted' with this additional baggage?

And, if you like some of what Fossil does and some of what Git does, then go and make a bastard stepchild of the two, but please do not advocate putting a bunch of "weird" stuff into Fossil!

*phew* I feel better now that I've said that...

:-)

--
michael at barrow dot me
+1.408.782.4249

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to