i hear you ;), but as i said at the start of this thread, i am ambivalent about which format(s) fossil supports, which may be interpreted as "i don't care, as long as someone else implements it" ;).
That said... If you have suggestions for a generic api for arbitrary wiki parsers/filters for libfossil, i am all ears. :) ----- stephan Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity and typos. On Oct 2, 2014 10:47 AM, "Gour" <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:48:55 -0400 > Trevor <tre...@breksta.com> wrote: > > > Markdown is versatile, simple format but the multiplicity of > > "standards" limits its universality. I hope you can contribute > > to the making of such a standard. > > I read a bit about the endeavour to make standard version of Markdown, > but here I'd propose (Stephen, do you hear me?) to try add support for > rendering AsciiDoc(tor) files which was already discussed in the past? > > It may be an easier task and AsciiDoc is much richer markup suitable for > wider range of documentation. > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the > fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities. > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
