On 8/3/2015 3:37 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 3, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8/3/2015 2:01 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: >>> On 3 August 2015 at 01:22, Matt Welland <mattrwell...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I've no idea if fossil mv now behaves exactly like mv. >>> >>> indeed, it does not. >> >> Any plans to bring them in sync? > > We had a long thread about it months ago: > > > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/2015-March/019997.html > > So far as I know, drh’s opinion remains: > > > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/2015-March/020055.html
Pretty sure he was talking about whether or not mv and rm should touch the checkout files, not about whether their semantics should be made to match those of the like-named Unix commands. -- Andy Goth | <andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
