On Jun 22, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > On 6/22/16, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: >> The only problem (or annoyance) I see with that is that we don't know from >> who the email come from unless we look at the signature at the bottom. > > I agree.
I haven’t used an email signature in many years now. I found reasons to drop one line at a time from the 4+ lines I used to send, until I removed the last one and didn’t miss it. (You don’t need my phone number, you don’t need my web site address, you don’t need my pithy quote, you don’t need my Geek Code, and you don’t need my ICBM Address.) Now you’re saying I need to start using one again just to identify myself on this list? > I just don't know of an alternative. Live with the spam. It’s small potatoes as problems go. I don’t know if we’re talking about the same spam, but the stuff I’m getting has a pretty simple pattern in its X-Authenticated-Sender header that makes it easy to send straight to the trash. I haven’t seen any of that in weeks, since the last minor adjustment to the rule. I’d post the rule here, but then this message would probably get caught up in someone’s aggressive spam filter. Just take a look at any two such messages, and you’ll probably see the same pattern. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
