On 09/12/2016 02:55 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > Clumsy, perhaps, but it would work today.
Thanks. The `fossil fusefs ...` performance kills the possibility of using Fossil as a large binary file repository manager. I find myself casually reading "Practical File System Design"[1] and the HDF5 Specs[2] and generally imagining what the requirements for a modern [instrumentation data] repository might be. If anyone wishes to discuss such a thing or otherwise share ideas, they are welcome to contact me. [1]: https://ia600404.us.archive.org/29/items/practical-file-system-design/practical-file-system-design.pdf [2]: https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/doc/Specs.html _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users