On 09/12/2016 02:55 PM, Ross Berteig wrote:
> Clumsy, perhaps, but it would work today.

Thanks. The `fossil fusefs ...` performance kills the possibility of
using Fossil as a large binary file repository manager.

I find myself casually reading "Practical File System Design"[1] and the
HDF5 Specs[2] and generally imagining what the requirements for a modern
[instrumentation data] repository might be. If anyone wishes to discuss
such a thing or otherwise share ideas, they are welcome to contact me.

[1]:
https://ia600404.us.archive.org/29/items/practical-file-system-design/practical-file-system-design.pdf
[2]: https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/doc/Specs.html
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to