Do records support inheritance in next FPC? 3.0.4 doesn't seem to allow that and this is the main reason i use objects when i need value types.
Actually, what are the differences between records and objects that make it impossible for records to get objects' features or objects to get records' features so there is no difference between the two and one become alias for the other? I often want value types and find myself having to choose between the two depending on the features i need. It'd be very nice if both had the same features or at least one became a full superset of the other. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:50 AM Sven Barth via fpc-devel <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote: > > Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com> schrieb am Fr., 24. Mai 2019, 01:20: >> >> I’m doing some work to upgrade old-style objects including class >> operators/management operators and better construction. > > > Please don't. They're legacy types (even though we don't consider them > obsolete) and geared towards the TP behavior and compatibility. > > Regards, > Sven > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
