On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 12:57 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > I'd rather see that the whole is coordinated a bit. I don't think all > this > duplication is a good idea; One solid set of components makes much > more > sense: the number of developers available for it's maintenance would > double. > The end user would also benefit, as we can give 1 solid set of > components, > no doubts possible.
I aggree with Michael on this. Besides, last time I looked at your 'TBufDataset' (which is a actually a fork, offcourse) it only implemented blob-fields, on top of the existing TBufDataset. The current TBufDataset also supports blob-fields, in a (in my opinion) better way, now. Are there any other changes/additions? Regards, Joost _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
