On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 14:02, Mipam wrote: > Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to > use, else why would it be in 5-stable.
The changes that have been merged to stable have been tested for some time in 6-CURRENT, so they're not completely experimental, yes. > Maybe i'm completly wrong in this interpretation? I'm not sure what your interpretation is. If you go by your own definition (what's in -stable should be safe to use), why do you ask at all? In any case, the ULE MFC commits are only a few days old, so there's naturally not much feedback available, good or bad. If you want to play it safe, wait a week or a month and monitor this lists for complaints before trying it yourself. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp1zRaPb8J3h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
