[Eugen Leitl] > A successor the the very popular PCEngines ALIX > http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm system > is in the works: http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm > > That would seem to be another potential hardware target.
The point I am trying to make is that we should focus on hardware available already with a lot of users. The fact that there is other hardware around (or soon to be available) that is nicher and more powerful and less dependend on non-free binary blobs is beside the point. We do not attract many potential developers by announcing support for some hardware almost no-one have at home already. :) I belive we need to focus on making the Freedombox useful for some set of users first, and then try to make it more secure and harder to track. Having your data in your own home provide legal protection that is easier to gain than the technical protection provided by access to the source and strong encryption. :) -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss