BTW, I still like the idea moving the US to adopt the double-CEO model: a President (head of state) and a Prime Minister (head of the government with a cabinet). May be, as some have said, it really is too big a job for one person.

On 11/4/12 1:54 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
More parties?  I'm for it!  :)

But seriously, one question on "fair voting": when you vote, can you vote for multiple candidates in priority order so that an "instant runoff" can be held?

 -- Owen


On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net <mailto:j...@cas-group.net>> wrote:


    Hi Nick,

    yes, it is similar where I live, although we have more parties in
    Germany (conservative, socialist, liberal and green parties). No,
    people usually do not change their mind in political discussions.
    They change their mind during the course of time, though. I
    changed my mind for example about our own chancellor, Angela
    Merkel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel . In the
    beginning I had doubts. She looks a bit clumsy and grumpy
    sometimes, and there are certainly politicians who have more
    charisma. But over the years I learned to appreciate her honesty,
    her modesty, and her kindness. She said she wants to serve her
    country, and she really does. She would never lie intentionally.
    This may seems obvious, but how can you trust someone who lies?

    What about you, do you vote for Romney, Obama or someone else,
    like Gary Johnson? From a psychological aspect, this election is
    interesting, isn't it?

    -J.


    Am 04.11.2012 03:39, schrieb Nicholas Thompson:
    Jochen, At this week's FRIAM meeting, we talked briefly about
    politics and it was clear that there was some disagreement around
    the table. We were about to let it go, on that ground, when I
    decided, spurred by my newly embraced pragmatist ideology, to beg
    that they all put their minds for 5 minutes to the question, "How
    do we go about having a conversation with people with whom we
    disagree? A conversation that would actually get somewhere." Our
    usual way of proceding is what I call "FogHorns on a Shrouded
    Bay." Each individual sounds off while the others listen politely
    or check their email on their cell phones. That goes around the
    circle a couple of times, and then people just drop the topic and
    go on to something else. On the whole, most people I know would
    rather be force fed castor oil than be convinced to change their
    minds. So, back to you, Jochen. Is it truly different where you
    are? Have you ever sat in on a political discussion in which
    anybody ever changed his or her mind? How did that happen? Nick
    From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
    Jochen Fromm Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 3:20 PM To:
    friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM]
    The Presidential Election Interesting read. Sometimes we wonder
    why other peoples voting decisions are fundamentally different
    from ours even if all good reasons speak against it. Are they
    backward or brainwashed? Jonathan Haidt has written a book named
    "The Righteous Mind" where he argues that people don't really
    listen to arguments or reasons. Guided by their emotions, they
    often come to a quick conclusion what is good or bad, and this
    decision is in accordance with their worldview and their moral
    system (regardless how skewed it may be).
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/the-righteous-mind-by-jonatha
    n-haidt.html?pagewanted=all
    <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/the-righteous-mind-by-jonath
    an-haidt.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0>  
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/the-righteous-mind-by-jonathan-haidt.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0>
  &_r=0

    -J.

    Am 03.11.2012 21:18, schrieb Roger Critchlow:

    Here's how backward the conservative heart of america beats:
http://www.thebaffler.com/past/the_long_con
    -- rec --
    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at
    cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps
    at http://www.friam.org


    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps athttp://www.friam.org


    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to