Marcus, agreed. Though I'm at the annual AI meeting and think this kind of 
surveillance may be the new normal. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 15, 2013, at 1:34 PM, "mar...@snoutfarm.com" <mar...@snoutfarm.com> 
wrote:

> "I'd be much more interested in hearing what
> Snowden's co-workers and bosses think.  It's too bad he wasn't there long
> enough
> to develop any real relationships with them before he flew off to Hong Kong
> to
> break his oath."
> 
> I recall there was an interview late-June with one of his colleagues that
> expressed roughly "I understand but wish he hadn't done it alone." 
> 
> Sorry I can't find the reference at the moment.  
> 
> In any case, the media fixation on this guy's judgement, training, loyalty
> or whatever is moot at this point.  He's a person, so he's flawed.  This
> all may have just been a royal screw-up on his part.  So what?
> 
> The issue should be what was disclosed (even if misguided or accidental)
> and how it relates to the constitution of the United States.  It's fine to
> dismiss him as weasel or a mole -- provided collective attention is given
> to these questionable moves at the highest levels of our government.  I'll
> be disappointed if the conclusion is just fascism:  "Do absolutely anything
> to protect U.S. economic interests from harm." 
> 
> Marcus
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail
> 
> 
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to