Glen, 
You are assuming that a very elaborate sophisticated machine based model will 
work better than swarms of  microbots stitching micro sized jpegs together.

Evolution by its persistence seems to prove that some small part is working 
correctly. This gives me some faith that we are not a lost cause. Furthermore 
the Impact of civilization has been underestimated. Writing allows the distant 
dead to still contribute to current investigations making their insights almost 
contemporary. I read the announcements of Google's   "Deep Think" and 
"TensorFlow" this week and was delighted to hear that this is Open Source Code.

I have a sense that AI's will become a stabilizing foundation of civilization 
and memory will no longer be limited to a single life time. Or a single POV.

A swarm of gnats with digital cameras and microphones may make a difference to 
all of us sooner than  a grand Nova Zeus machine.

Oh goody more Code to play with.
vib


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen ?
Sent: February-21-17 4:26 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: Fractal discussion Landscape-bird songs


Tesselation vs. approximation: Ah, right.  I was sloppy with my language.  
Sorry.

What you say in the blurb below is questionable because it implies something 
about the representations ... something like an equivalence of expressive power 
or somesuch.  If there is such a thing as expressive power, then a stronger 
representation should not be recoverable from a weaker one.  But I suppose if 
they all are built from the same type of basis set, then multiple weak ones 
allow recovery of strong ones.

I'm always fascinated by the emphasis we (all) place on coherence and internal 
consistency.  It seems like some sort of rhetorical fallacy, perhaps the 
fallacy fallacy.  Perhaps we can arrive at the truth in spite of completely 
flawed (e.g. self-inconsistent) representations?  Even a broken clock (Trump) 
is right (a)periodically.

On 02/21/2017 01:09 PM, Vladimyr Burachynsky wrote:
> In some manner every representation whatever default settings have been 
> applied should be recoverable with every other representation and coherent.
> The more coherent viewpoints the closer the approximation of Truth.


--
☣ glen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to