Some memory, and the ongoing recombination and optimization of less fit (high 
energy) individuals which tend to create other less fit individuals.   
In this optimization system there are numerous methods that are used to create 
fit individuals, but the ones that create the very best individuals do not 
arise from recombination + selection pressure.   Mixing two distinct (large 
Hamming distance) globally constraint-satisfying solutions tends to create a 
non-constraint satisfying solutions.  It is only once the two parents are very 
similar (e.g. same species) that such a recombination will even work, but by 
then it doesn't do all that much.   

Computationally, it easier to try more approaches and maintain a large 
population than it is accelerate the algorithms that are most effective.  (For 
the former, just add more cores.)

On 1/2/19, 8:57 AM, "Friam on behalf of ∄ uǝʃƃ" <friam-boun...@redfish.com on 
behalf of geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Are there computational (or otherwise not shown) costs to the members that 
continue in the free case but are pruned in the selection case?
    
    On 1/2/19 7:44 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
    > Here are a couple of plots from a large constrained optimization problem 
I've been running.   
    > In the first case, I apply selection pressure:  If a solution is not in 
the top 200 performers, it dies.
    > In the second case, the population can continue to grow without concern 
for its performance.   
    > This is a 5900-dimensional pseudo-boolean problem and the best-known 
solution is around 2.61e+08.   Note the low end of the y axis is not close to 
this.   In both cases, aggressive efforts are made to diversify the population 
and in both cases every shown solution is unique (even though their energies 
can collide). 
    > 
    > In this case, I would argue that selection pressure has accomplished 
nothing -- conservatism doesn't work if the goal is to create the most fit 
individuals.  The mean moves, if you care about that.   But the very best 
solutions are nearly the same, and neither have come close to the optimal.   
    
    
    -- 
    ∄ uǝʃƃ
    
    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
    

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to