glen wrote:
IDK. The implication that we already have laws that cover (80%?) of the use cases for new tech we, as a society, want to discourage, is a good default. It resists the "there ought to be a law" sensibility held by old people and curmudgeons everywhere. And it keeps our legal system a little more adaptive than it would be were we to burden it with even more persnickety case-by-case rulings.

sas> I try to hear "there oughtta be a law" as pining for a new and relevant heuristic where the old one(s) don't work (well)?

<episode 1>

   In my early coding years I remember coming to the simultaneous
   understanding that the bulk of most systems/code is "exception
   handling" and that most inexperienced coders tend to ignore the
   edge/corner cases until forced (by iterated releases with real users
   as their test-load) and spaghetti up their solutions one exception
   at a time, and sometimes if they don't abstract their exceptions
   well enough the exception handling expands geometrically (with
   exceptions to the exceptions, recursively).


<episode 2>

   In my Private Investigator years I spent my share of time in /law
   offices/ and /courthouses/ and rubbing shoulders with /law
   enforcement/...  I came to understand that these too were episystems
   on top of episystems with a scissors/paper/stone circularity built
   into the system to attenuate runaway behaviour by each "branch" of
   government (and/or it's agents).

   The law libraries were dominated in volume and complexity by
   case-law which felt to me to be nothing other than edge-corner
   case/exception-handling...   Most of my clients represented
   plaintiffs in civil cases, a few defendants.   Only those with big
   bucks pursued legal-action, lawyers (and court fees and PIs) being
   expensive and only those in desperate circumstance could muster the
   resources to fight back (see DJT's strategy as taught to him by Roy
   Cohn).

   The lawyers (and the rest of us by extension) thrived on this
   "tangled web of mal-complexity" and I had the (mis)fortune of
   listening in to lawyers and paralegals discuss how they would
   exploit these tangles for their clients...  even to the point of
   trying to enlist me in throwing some extra tanglage into the
   equation myself.

<episode 2.2>

   I stayed above that where I recognized it, trying to refactor my
   client intake process, leading me to my own exception handling: e.g.

    1. Divorces with children
    2. Divorces with pets
    3. Divorces

    1. Insurance claim denial
    2. Insurance claims
    3. Insurance companies as claimant or defendant

    1. Distressed Real Estate Foreclosures
    2. Real Estate Foreclosures
    3. Real Estate Transactions

    1. /ad//
       /
    2. /nauseum/
    3. /infinitum/

<episode 2.99>

   by the time I graduated college I was well over-done with this work
   which lead me almost exclusively to seeing (feeling, smelling,
   tasting) the seamy underbelly of my community (and the world by
   extension).  I began with: "I will only take righteous cases"  and
   ended with "there are no righteous cases".

   <episode 3>So I doubled down and went to Los Alamos to help make
   weapons of mass destruction under the premise of MAD! I considered
   investigative journalism for a few minutes instead... but for /seamy
   underbelly/ problem and the allure of /Nuclear
   Weapons-as-fundamental-physics-and-reality-insight/ I might have
   gone there.

<episode N>

   Thankfully I have aged out on a lot of that and am happy to defer
   most of the "hard questions" to Sabine Hossenfelder  and Randall
   Munroe who are much smarter and more clever at expressing it than I
   ever will be or have been!

   I just watched her very convincing episode on why free will is an
   illusion.  I found her very convincing, but realize that she and I
   had absolutely no choice in the matter of being compelling or
   compelled...   I  have the illusion that I'm one step closer to
   Satori now...  until Glen hits me with a stick again!

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to