Thomas Adam wrote: > For those of you who follow fvwm-workers@ may already know some of this, but > for those of you who don't, it's worth mentioning what the state of fvwm > development holds for the future.
I am a long time fvwm user, and I have not touched my ".fvwmrc" in years because it just works. Despite that: IMHO it is fine to move forward. I do not follow the devel mailing list. There is a single very selfish request I have: continue to allow fvwm to fully configure the use of the keyboard (I have fvwm intercept the function keys (F1, ...) to do stuff for me, and it is my killer feature). One thing I have desired in the past is a more flexible, structured and clean format for the configuration file. I do not like to push people into doing work, but what about using an extension language? Is Lua core small enough? Thanks for all the work on fvwm. -- Marco
