On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:03:52PM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: > We won't need the > fvwm2 symlink at all since that would be misleading, surely?
Yes, it's time to remove it (and the fvwm2.1 symlink), and probably the xpmroot symlink too. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
