On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:58:07PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 06 Apr 2006 12:47:59 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > > >Do you mean this text: > > > > > > > > They are searched in the reverse order stated. > > > > When two conflicting styles apply to the same window, the style > > > > that was changed last wins. > > I think it will help if we use different terms instead of one term > "style" meaning different things. I always use term "style option" to > mean individual bit(s), "style" to mean named structure, and "Style" to > mean fvwm command.
Yes, you are right. I've tried to write something like this, but your wording is so much better. > So, how about this: > > When two opposite style options are specified for the same window > (like Sticky and Slippery), then the last specified option wins. > > Example: > > Style gnome-terminal SloppyFocus, Slippery > Style gnome-* Slippery, SloppyFocus, MouseFocus, HandleWidth 6 > Style *-terminal Sticky > > This results to "gnome-terminal" to be Sticky and use MouseFocus. > > In this example, the "Style gnome-terminal SloppyFocus, Slippery" > line is effectivelly optimized out and does not consume memory. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
