On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 09/08/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think opinions have been exchanged by now. So, who of the > > people who promote "FVWM" as fvwm's name is willing to do the > > following: > > > > * Rename *all* occurences in *all* files in the fvwm and > > fvwm-web repositories from "fvwm" or "Fvwm" to "FVWM", > > Excluding symbolic names in the source files. > > I am more than happy to. > > > * This includes > > > > - The name of the CVS repositories (FVWM and FVWM-web). > > - The names of the mailing lists (FVWM, FVWM-workers, etc.) > > - File names (fvwm.c -> FVWM.c, fio.c -> Fio.c, > > fsm.h -> Fsm.h etc.) > > You're stretching the point a little far here -- you can keep the > filenames as-is.
I think you have no idea of the extend of my efforts to keep naming consistent in the source tree. > > - The names of the executables (fvwm -> FVWM, make_fvwmdist.sh > > Again, you can keep that as-is. > > > * Take the responsibility to explain to the users why this was > > done and why their config files are broken. > > I am happy to update the documentation to reflect s/fvwm/FVWM/g in > *context* -- nothing else needs to change. And I'm happy if you *don't* do it just in context. I've spent many hours to have consistent spelling all over the place. > You're angry -- so I will let some of your points go without rising to > the challenge. I'm serous about every single pont. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
