On 16 March 2010 21:36, David Chanters <david.chant...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 16 March 2010 21:15, Thomas Adam <tho...@xteddy.org> wrote: >> No, I am afraid not. Before I fixed it, it was broken. I can't even think > > i dont like this - can you add an option to keep the old behavior?
Sorry, but to revert this would just be wrong -- so the answer is "no". I suggest you restate what it is you thought you had with the old (and *broken*) behaviour, and then I will suggest to you: * Ultimately why you were wrong to make that assumption. * An alternative solution. Although I suspect, given my previous reply to you, it's going to go unheeded. -- Thomas Adam
