On 2011.10.28 at 00:41 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > > It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I > > cannot attach the patch even as a gzip file, because of its size: > > > > 417745 Oct 28 00:47 0001-update-to-libtool-2.4.2-and-regenerate.patch.gz > > > > Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > > > Comments? Stage 1 will end soon and it would be nice to get this in. > > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02037.html> - have those > been resolved, and if so, how? And what about the directories only > present in the src repository that will also need updating for such a > toplevel change?
Oops, you're right, libtools "with_sysroot" still clashes with gcc's notion. But that should be easily fixable by just reverting one commit (3334f7ed5851ef1) in libtool. I'm afraid I don't understand your second question. Can you elaborate on that? And BTW my patch was just meant to get the ball rolling, not necessary as the final solution. -- Markus