On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:

> > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in 
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02037.html> - have those 
> > been resolved, and if so, how?  And what about the directories only 
> > present in the src repository that will also need updating for such a 
> > toplevel change?
> 
> Oops, you're right, libtools "with_sysroot" still clashes with gcc's
> notion. But that should be easily fixable by just reverting one commit
> (3334f7ed5851ef1) in libtool.
> I'm afraid I don't understand your second question. Can you elaborate on
> that?

Because of the shared toplevel build system, the gcc and src repositories 
need to have their configure scripts etc. regenerated at the same time for 
a change such as this (and it should be tested that binutils, newlib and 
the other directories in the src repository do still build properly after 
the regeneration).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to