On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Madhusudan Singh wrote: > Now, if I could use a library that came with properly defined symbols > (instead of just empty pretty pictures that they are right now), I > could see the utility of doing this.
A common complaint. But when you look deeper you find that nearly everyone who makes this complaint has a different idea of what a "properly defined symbol" might be. There are so many ways to use gEDA, and millions of electronic parts on the market. A library of a trillion symbols would not suffice. > Without that, its a waste of time. The big time wasters are tools that force your project away from the flow it needs. gEDA doesn't do that. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
