On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM, DJ Delorie <[1]d...@delorie.com> wrote:
> I truly believe that you have to take the strict viewpoint of the hardware > designers who will be the majority of users -- and not sit back as a > programmer --- when it comes to laying out a reasonable User Interface for > an EDA Tool. The OrCad tool was a prime example of this. I gave a set of labs at DevCon to Windows-based hardware engineers. The environment was 100% Fedora + gEDA. They had no problem doing the common tasks, and never saw a text terminal. I recall now reading about this on some other thread last month but couldn't remember. I found the thread from last month. But now I went to your website and couldn't find any mention of this. I did see some of your work with the Renesas mcu and the geda workflow. I also found other search results about this subject regarding your work on other website and even youtube. Something like this should be front and center right on the gEDA website. Who's the webmaster for geda, this should be on there. At the very least there should be links on [2]gpleda.org pointing to this info.. =Dan References 1. mailto:d...@delorie.com 2. http://gpleda.org/
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user