On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >>> ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you >>> want to reconsider your veto.... >> >> As this vote is not about a technical issue, I don't think there are >> vetos - we should have explicitely specified that this is a majority >> vote. >> >> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just >> express your disagreement with the majority? > > i consider making claims about third party copyright ownership rather > than a statement of fact is positively dangerous from a legal > perspective > > so, it's a legal team veto until i have chance to review (my exam is > tomorrow morning so i should be able to find some time in the > afternoon)...
Ok, this should leave enough time for you to review within this vote's 72 hours duration ;-) Please review this thread on the legal-discuss list, in particular: http://markmail.org/thread/fy3gfbgezgkcq44j Several experienced folks have voiced their opinions there, we didn't just make this up out of thin air. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
