On Jun 4, 2011 2:03 AM, "Sam Ruby" <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > However I > will state that in cases where widespread use of the code is vital for > advancing the cause of free software that the Apache License, Version > 2.0 is an appropriate choice: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html
Have you checked that with the FSF, Sam? That recommendation applies to code expected to have a wide and diverse range of derivatives (libraries for example). Comments by FSF board member Bradley Kuhn on Rob's blog confirm this. S.
