On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 15:20, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: >... > Just to drag the point here from the other thread where it was made, the > problem is less the size of the code (although it is enormous and will make > a great stress test for the SVN team :-) ) and more the need for frequent
Nah. OOo won't stress svn. We've seen MUCH larger repositories and working copy checkouts. That's why I was interested in learning more about the specific problems from the OOo team since it is well "within bounds" of Subversion's capabilities. It sounds more like workflow than a specific tool issue, though. It may have also been caused by earlier releases of Subversion (1.0 thru 1.4) which did not have merge tracking features. Cheers, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
