On 23/05/07, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote: > * Slide. There's some sign of activity here. Not enough yet. > > * Cactus. Tiny bit of activity, again not enough for a TLP. > > * JMeter. Lots of commits from Sebb, but not a big community.
We have invited another person to become a committer, but so far he has not accepted. I need to chase that up.
> > For all three of these the best solution I can think of is to move > them to the Incubator. Keep the lists where they are, move the svn, > move the websites. They need to be thinking TLP, they need to get > community. I think the people that work on and use these projects would feel somewhat marginalized if they were pushed over to Incubator.
I feel abandoned by Jakarta. Do all the Commons sub-projects have sufficient numbers ot committers to justify them remaining in Commons? For example CLI has not even had a formal release yet and has been far less active than JMeter, but is still protected by being in Commons.
How about we have four categories in "Jakarta Commons becomes Jakarta": * proper * sandbox * dormant * jakarta-holdouts (replace this with a better name of your choosing) The last one being a home for these projects until they can find a home elsewhere (tlp or otherwise). Would it be correct to say that one of the reasons for a commons to go tlp was that a more focused PMC is required going forward? This would still be possible with a few holdouts in the mix.
Scott (crawls back under rock)
Sebastian Another rock fell on my foot ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
