Before someone jumps in and says "that's not true"... ...That's not true...
hehe... From what I see, onesis is a kit of wrapper scripts which seem to automate most of the procedure on my wiki. The problem with wrapper scripts is that they have to be maintained and, when it comes to automating system configuration, they tend to restrict that only _THEY_ perform modifications on the config files. Another example of this is LTSP, you can either choose to use their ltspadmin interface to configure DHPC, pxeboot, NFS and all the other stuff or you do it manually. In my case, I do it manually and the scripts don't recognize that I have done the job. so... Pros of doing it manually: - You have total control - You _have_ to know what you are doing - you're not limited to the path imposed by the tool (this applies to both distributions and "admin" scripts) Cons: - You have to control everything - You _have_ to know what you are doing - There is a steep learning curve in most cases - Sysadmins (to be read as MCSE people) dUn't like it This said, Josh, have you tried it yourself?...comments?...feedback ;) Eric Le Mardi 11 Avril 2006 15:39, Simon-Nicolas Roth a écrit : > No, > > I prefer the unionfs way. To me it is more simple to have one / for all nodes > and another / for the server. > > Simon > > Le Tuesday 11 April 2006 16:13, Josh England a écrit : > > Have you tried using oneSIS for going diskless? > > > > emerge -va onesis > > > > Check out http://onesis.org for more info. > > > > -JE > > -- Eric Thibodeau Neural Bucket Solutions Inc. T. (514) 736-1436 C. (514) 710-0517 -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
