On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:19:43 +0200 Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | What about !arch or something (to connect with the one reply to the > | summary thread) to really indicate unstable on that arch? Should > | cover those things that sorda work on the arch, but you rather want > | developers or experienced users that can patch bugs to look at it ... > > Those go in per-profile package.masks. It's more flexible than a > keyword. >
I would have said a keyword is more flexible (and less work) than package.masks, but I do not put that much value in the idea - was more just to have something more to kick around. -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
