-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 21:54 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> 1. Due to the tardiness in the election process, there was no council
>> meeting in September. Will this council have 11 meetings or will its
>> term end in September of next year?
> 
> There's no need for us to be so strict.  I see no reason why the new
> Council can't have their full year.  In fact, I'm so confident in it
> being all fair to give them a full year that I propose we just accept it
> and not bother discussing it further.  ;]  The previous 2 Councils had
> their 12 meetings, why shouldn't this one?
> 
>> 2. Regardless of the decision about the above, we should define a clear
>> schedule for the council's election to ensure that the previous issue
>> doesn't happen anymore. Given that we have a 1 month election period for
>> the council, preceded by a 15 day(?) nomination period, that means that
>> the election process must start before the last meeting of the existing
>> council. So, if the election were to be held during August, the
>> nomination should start on July 15th. I propose the election officials
>> be chosen at the same date - so as not to delay the process.
> 
> Let's assume that the new Council will preside from October through
> September.  This would have elections done by September 30th, and
> nominations starting on August 1st, as we usually do 1 month for
> nominations and one month for voting.
> 

I agree with you on both points.
However, the council still needs to "approve" it as it is a "change of
policy" and so that no one has any doubts / objections later.
I still insist that the election officials should be selected as soon as
the nomination period starts to avoid any delays on the voting - we
should never again enter an election without having election officials.

- --
Regards,

Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / SPARC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHAagscAWygvVEyAIRAgJCAJ9y4V+dGWSEK9lNalPLffYvbnuYKQCgmpKt
KOvj/kD0oDUn1zNVKSZm4WI=
=LZdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to